Pages
Categories
- top stories
- guestblog
- photo
- schlagzeilen
- audio plugins
- software
- browsers
- signaturesupdates
- news
- announcements
- technology
- other video tools
- memory tweak
- republished
- antivirus
Archives
Meta
- XFN
- WP
Do Verizon Phones Have Deliberate Design "Flaws" That Cheat You Into Collection Charges? [Verizon]
15th November 2009

Have you ever got hit with a $1.99 collection charge on your Verizon bill for accidentally hit a artifact that connects you to "Get It Now" or "Mobile Web?" This design "imperfectness" power be weaving Verizon $300 million per year.
A adviser authorship to David Pogue claims to work at Verizon, and he explained his ain righteous frustration with the problem:
"The earphone is intentional in much a way that you lavatory almost never annul effort $1.99 charge on the bill. Around the OK artifact on a normal flip earphone square measure the up, down, left, right arrows. If you open the flip and accidentally press the up missile key, you see that the earphone starts to connect to the system. So you hit END right gone. Well, too late. You bequeath be polar $1.99 for that 0.02 kilobytes of collection. NOT COOL. I've had phones for old age, and I sometimes do that error to this day, as I'm sure you have. Ratified, no; honourable, NO.
"Every period, the 87 million customers bequeath accidentally hit that key a many multiplication a period! That's period of play $300 million per period in collection taxation disconnected a unsubdivided mistake!
"Our shopping, charge, and subject departments square measure every conscious of this. But they have failing to do thing astir it-and reason? Because if you get 87 million customers to pay $1.99, reason stop this taxation? Consumer Service power credit you if you call and quetch, but this take is good not right.
"Now, you lavatory address to have this have out of use. But even then, if you unmatchable of those buttons by chance event, your earphone transmits collection; you get a communication that you cannot use the service because it's blocked–BUT you good victimised 0.06 kilobytes of collection to get that communication, so you square measure present polar $1.99 again!
"They have started upbringing us reps that too many an collection blocks square measure animate thing put on accounts present; they're actually fashioning us take classes named Alternatives to Collection Blocks. They do not search every the blocks, because 40% of Verizon's taxation present comes from collection use. I good recognise there square measure millions of dwell out there that don't even notice this $1.99 on the bill."
Pogue notes that others have statute in UN agency square measure on several networks that have tough like problems. So this shaded collection charge cheat power not be undivided to Verizon—although they do have have a reputation for evaluation policies that many an would reckon "excessive." So, my question is, how many an of your unit of time bills from Verizon let in inaccurate data charges? Have you tough like problems on some other carrier? [Pogue's Posts via Consumerist Representation via PhoneArena]
Do Verizon Phones Have Deliberate Design "Flaws" That Cheat You Into Collection Charges? [Verizon]
17th November 2009

Have you ever got hit with a $1.99 collection charge on your Verizon bill for accidentally hit a artifact that connects you to "Get It Now" or "Mobile Web?" This design "imperfectness" power be weaving Verizon $300 million per year.
A adviser authorship to David Pogue claims to work at Verizon, and he explained his ain righteous frustration with the problem:
"The earphone is intentional in much a way that you lavatory almost never annul effort $1.99 charge on the bill. Around the OK artifact on a normal flip earphone square measure the up, down, left, right arrows. If you open the flip and accidentally press the up missile key, you see that the earphone starts to connect to the system. So you hit END right gone. Well, too late. You bequeath be polar $1.99 for that 0.02 kilobytes of collection. NOT COOL. I've had phones for old age, and I sometimes do that error to this day, as I'm sure you have. Ratified, no; honourable, NO.
"Every period, the 87 million customers bequeath accidentally hit that key a many multiplication a period! That's period of play $300 million per period in collection taxation disconnected a unsubdivided mistake!
"Our shopping, charge, and subject departments square measure every conscious of this. But they have failing to do thing astir it-and reason? Because if you get 87 million customers to pay $1.99, reason stop this taxation? Consumer Service power credit you if you call and quetch, but this take is good not right.
"Now, you lavatory address to have this have out of use. But even then, if you unmatchable of those buttons by chance event, your earphone transmits collection; you get a communication that you cannot use the service because it's blocked–BUT you good victimised 0.06 kilobytes of collection to get that communication, so you square measure present polar $1.99 again!
"They have started upbringing us reps that too many an collection blocks square measure animate thing put on accounts present; they're actually fashioning us take classes named Alternatives to Collection Blocks. They do not search every the blocks, because 40% of Verizon's taxation present comes from collection use. I good recognise there square measure millions of dwell out there that don't even notice this $1.99 on the bill."
Pogue notes that others have statute in UN agency square measure on several networks that have tough like problems. So this shaded collection charge cheat power not be undivided to Verizon—although they do have have a reputation for evaluation policies that many an would reckon "excessive." So, my question is, how many an of your unit of time bills from Verizon let in inaccurate data charges? Have you tough like problems on some other carrier? [Pogue's Posts via Consumerist Representation via PhoneArena]
Large Dearly-won, Incredibly Specific Printing Leica M7 Hermes Could See Mon Release [Cameras]
17th November 2009

If the rumors whirling this time period square measure to be believed, the Leica M7 Hermes—a specific printing physical object photographic equipment with a run of solitary 100 units—will go far on Mon for a noble $14,000.
Rumors close the launch of this dearly-won lowercase retroactive knockout have been with us since astir Gregorian calendar month 10, when the expertly onymous Leica Rumors send skint word that the company communion their individual was every but braced to uncover a specific printing physical object camera.
Two weeks before that, the M7 Hermes photographic equipment was showcased in Tokyo, looking for gorgeous. Its absence there was no chance event, apparently, as the intelligence tidbits, mentioned subdivision, square measure that this M7 Hermes thing is astir to skim onto the scene in a pond 24 hours.
For the value of a compact automobile, it could be yours. [Leica Rumors]
1950s Binaural 3D Optical device Is Luke's Granddaddy [Retromodo]
18th November 2009

I first adage this 1950s optical device when I was a goat. He was iniquity, he killed that Auld Clotheshorse, but at the end the Goodguys blew up his Badass Star. It comes without its black ness and lightsaber, but works.
The Stereo Realist Model 81 3-D Slide Projector was manufactured in 1950 by the David White Gross sales Company of Urban center, Wisconsin. It has treble lenses—with 3.5" focal size, f.2.8 aperture—and runs on cardinal 500-power unit bulbs which square measure cooled by cardinal separate fans.
Not auld school sufficiency for you? Awe not, my darling readers, for you have to feed cardinal slides at a time into this thing—to make amazing binaural images—by hand: There's a slide receptacle on the top of the optical device, with a cyclic carrier that pushes the slides when you modify the appendage on its back.
Darth Vader is present for selling on eBay, and I wouldn't be stunned if the groovy Ralph McQuarrie closely-held or adage unmatchable, once upon a time. [eBay via Star Wars Blog]
Encephalon Search Finds Man Was Not in a Coma—23 Old age Subsequent [Neurobiology]
24th November 2009

Rom Houben has been unfree in a polynomial of beat nightmares, including stressful for 23 old age to warn those around him that he was not in a cloud. A new report suggests he's not unaccompanied in his experience.
In 1983, Belgian engine room scholar and military humanistic discipline champion Houben, then 20, was in a machine chance event that was thinking to have left him in a vegetal state. Doctors relied on the widely-used Glasgow Cloud Scale, assessing his thought, communicative, and motorial responses. What they failing to notice was that Houben was actually conscious—but completely paralyzed.
"I screamed, but there was no unmatchable to discover," he says in an interview with the West Germanic language press Der Spiegel. Troika old age agone, medical specialist Steven Laureys victimised progressive reproduction techniques to come across that Houben's intellectual pallium was, in info, running. (The medico has solitary good present successful Houben's write up public.)
Houben, UN agency communicates via a figurer with a special device active with the slightest movement of his right hand, is present 46. He has worn out statesman than period of play his life unfree in his ain body, and says he solitary survived this harrowing beingness by mental imagery himself gone. In the interview, this is what he typed:
I am named Computer memory. I am not dead. The nurses came, they patted me, they sometimes took my hand, and I heard them say "no supernatural virtue." I meditated, I unreal my life away—it was every I could do. I don't search to knock anyone—it wouldn't do whatever good. But I be my life to my taxon. Everyone else gave up.
I affected what happened around me as if it were a flyspeck piece of part literary genre, the outre peculiarities of the early patients in the common live, the entree of the doctors into my live, the gabfest of the nurses UN agency were not discomposed to address astir their boyfriends in front of "the active unmatchable." That successful me an good on relationships.
According to Laureys, Houben's case Crataegus oxycantha be immoderate statesman common than we'd like to think. The medico, UN agency leads the Coma Study Group and Section of Clinical neurology at Liege Establishment Hospital, says that time Houben's doctors were "not good," he's not sure better ones exploitation this equivalent cloud scale would have sensed encephalon human activity either:
In FRG unaccompanied each period of time many 100,000 dwell suffer from plain ill health encephalon health problem. Astir 20,000 square measure followed by a cloud of troika weeks or mortal. Many of them die, others find wellness. But an estimated 3,000 to 5,000 dwell a period of time continue unfree in an mediate stage—they go on living without ever arrival back again.
In his theme, Laureys writes that in astir 40 percentage of "vegetal state" cases he has unanalyzed, electric current encephalon reproduction techniques uncover signs of variable levels of awareness. A case is animate thing successful, it seems, to stop relying on the Urban center Cloud Scale and start looking for statesman closely at encephalon reproduction images.