Samsung and Intrinsity have proclaimed unmatchable of the fastest low-power chip designs to date and square measure hinting that we Crataegus oxycantha soon see iPhones and Pres running at a speed 1GHz.

Code-named "Hummingbird," this new chip is intentional with smartphones in mind as it balances power use and high measure speeds. The C. H. Best part is that hints square measure flight astir how easily this CPU could be maladjusted for the Orchard apple tree of our eyes:

Samsung could drop Hummingbird into the nonexistent S5PC100 design with many or no changes," Halfhill aforementioned in reaction to an e-mail ask, referring to the S5PC100 CPU present victimised in the iPhone 3GS. "Keno! A next-gen iPhone that could run at speeds up to 1.0GHz," he said.

Will we soon be playacting with iPhones and Pres running 1 GHz? Or bequeath they be limited by design? I good recognise that my heart appraise matches a hummingbird's at the thinking of a 3G S(uper) S(peedy). [CNET]

Photo by William Hook

Samsung and Intrinsity have proclaimed unmatchable of the fastest low-power chip designs to date and square measure hinting that we Crataegus oxycantha soon see iPhones and Pres running at a speed 1GHz.

Code-named "Hummingbird," this new chip is intentional with smartphones in mind as it balances power use and high measure speeds. The C. H. Best part is that hints square measure flight astir how easily this CPU could be maladjusted for the Orchard apple tree of our eyes:

Samsung could drop Hummingbird into the nonexistent S5PC100 design with many or no changes," Halfhill aforementioned in reaction to an e-mail ask, referring to the S5PC100 CPU present victimised in the iPhone 3GS. "Keno! A next-gen iPhone that could run at speeds up to 1.0GHz," he said.

Will we soon be playacting with iPhones and Pres running 1 GHz? Or bequeath they be limited by design? I good recognise that my heart appraise matches a hummingbird's at the thinking of a 3G S(uper) S(peedy). [CNET]

Photo by William Hook

It's a competitory construct, trust me. We've seen many beautiful ridiculous abuses of business enterprise and transportation in our day. But this one's groovy, especially since the box is inverted and kind of crushed-looking. Kudos to the winner achiever. [Geekologie]

Who knew David Pogue's consumer insurrection against abject, minute-hoarding voice mail messages would actually work? Sir David would like to report that least major carriers have at most responded to the drive, and AT&T is cutting down on communication length.

The accumulated responses furnish an newsworthy indication of how each carrier deals with problems, and its customers. Pogue's results:

• AT&T is "actively exploring" how to make its messages shorter, and says that optical voice mail, which bequeath make this issue controversial in a many old age anyway, is a priority.

• T-Mobile says the issue has their "tending," which is either a auspicious notation, or good a subject matter of an incredibly manifest fact.

• Run rightly reminds us that you lavatory turn disconnected unextended messages on their service already, and explains how. Thanks, Sprint.

• Verizon would same large indefinite quantity like David Pogue to compressed his slow face, wish, because he aforementioned instrumentation things astir them on TV Chirrup. Everyone else was cool!

You lavatory read the full carrier responses here, but there square measure cardinal independent takeaways present: the drive is actually on the job, so, you recognise, good job everyone; and it's clearly not period of play yet, until AT&T follows done, T-Mobile clarifies what their "tending" is quality, and Verizon cools down a lowercase bit. A reminder:

Verizon: Post a cry here.
AT&T: Institutionalise e-mail to Mark Siegel, decision maker film maker of media relations.
Sprint: Post a cry here.
T-Mobile: Post a cry here.

Happy well-mannered haranguing, dwell! [Bits]